<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter client apps need to step it up a notch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lorenheiny.com/2008/06/15/twitter-client-apps-need-to-step-it-up-a-notch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lorenheiny.com/2008/06/15/twitter-client-apps-need-to-step-it-up-a-notch/</link>
	<description>Loren Heiny</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LCH</title>
		<link>http://www.lorenheiny.com/2008/06/15/twitter-client-apps-need-to-step-it-up-a-notch/#comment-4105</link>
		<dc:creator>LCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lorenheiny.com/2008/06/15/twitter-client-apps-need-to-step-it-up-a-notch/#comment-4105</guid>
		<description>Thanks I haven't tried Twixxer. (http://twixxer.com/) From the Twixxer site: "Twixxer is a photo and video sharing component for Twitter.com users who are normally restricted to text-only updates that contain links to media. It is comprised of a browser add-on and a web service." Works inside Firefox.

Sounds great. I'd like to see it as a desktop app. That would be much more useful to me.

Great to see someone going in this direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks I haven&#8217;t tried Twixxer. (http://twixxer.com/) From the Twixxer site: &#8220;Twixxer is a photo and video sharing component for Twitter.com users who are normally restricted to text-only updates that contain links to media. It is comprised of a browser add-on and a web service.&#8221; Works inside Firefox.</p>
<p>Sounds great. I&#8217;d like to see it as a desktop app. That would be much more useful to me.</p>
<p>Great to see someone going in this direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.lorenheiny.com/2008/06/15/twitter-client-apps-need-to-step-it-up-a-notch/#comment-4104</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lorenheiny.com/2008/06/15/twitter-client-apps-need-to-step-it-up-a-notch/#comment-4104</guid>
		<description>Have you seen Twixxer? It's a plug-in for Firefox users. It does a lot of what you're talking about, but only on the web. It shows Flickr thumbnails inline, and embeds video players for YouTube and Viddler videos. It's also a URL-shortening service that displays the destination URL for shortened URLs below tweets (not quite as snazzy as a thumbnail preview, but at least you know what domain you're being sent to).

I built Twixxer a few months ago, and its functionality will be available in a desktop application that is currently in development.

Also, inline photos, videos, and link destination previews are only scratching the surface of what I think a desktop application should be able to do. I don't expect the developers of Snitter, Twhirl, or Twitteriffic to built all the features I want to see. That's why I'm building my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen Twixxer? It&#8217;s a plug-in for Firefox users. It does a lot of what you&#8217;re talking about, but only on the web. It shows Flickr thumbnails inline, and embeds video players for YouTube and Viddler videos. It&#8217;s also a URL-shortening service that displays the destination URL for shortened URLs below tweets (not quite as snazzy as a thumbnail preview, but at least you know what domain you&#8217;re being sent to).</p>
<p>I built Twixxer a few months ago, and its functionality will be available in a desktop application that is currently in development.</p>
<p>Also, inline photos, videos, and link destination previews are only scratching the surface of what I think a desktop application should be able to do. I don&#8217;t expect the developers of Snitter, Twhirl, or Twitteriffic to built all the features I want to see. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m building my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
